PipeChat Digest #35 - Sunday, August 17, 1997
(back) Subject: Re: Best Lining for Pipe Chambers? Any thoughts? From: "Jim Saenger" <chamade@Early.COM> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 97 09:53:46 PDT The best lining for pipe chambers is a matter to be decided, one chamber at a time! In so many cases with typical 20th century chambers, drywall/sheetrock/regips is the surface treatment of choice. With brick, concrete and masonry working with adequate thermal insulation, excellent results can be had without much of a surface treatment. Again, the chamber itself and the musical requirements best determine the approach. Very often, especially in smaller chambers -for whatever application- the geometry of the room may be more influential than the chamber lining. The strength, weight and rigidity of chamber surfaces can also be as important as the surface treatment. Multiple layers of sheetrock, ideally of different thickness, with irregular studs and cross braces is a popular and thorough treatment in many cases. An interesting study was done when the Limburg, Germany cathedral organ was built: This organ is in casework, with a swell division enclosed in C and C# sides. One side of the swellbox was built with multiple laminations of the same thickness of wood. The other side was built with layers of different weights, to the same finished thickness. The frequency response was somewhat different between the two sides. Jim Saenger ---------- > I'm wondering what would be the best material to use to line the walls of a > pipe chamber in order that it be as "reflective" as possible. > > Normal building material like drywall sheetrock seems to me to be mighty > porous and thus inappropriate. What would be the best alternative? Plywood > painted with several coats of polyurathane? Masonite? Some sort of skin of > metal (say aluminum)? > > What think ye? > > > > "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" > PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics > HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org > List: mailto:email@example.com > Administration: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:email@example.com > >
(back) Subject: From: "Richard Meckstroth" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 16:41:39 -0400 Can anybody suggest sources of MIDI keyboards and pedalboards suitable for building a console? Unless you think your answer will be of general interest, you can send it to me directly. Thanks, Dick Meckstroth email@example.com
(back) Subject: Re: Best Lining for Pipe Chambers? Any thoughts? From: "Paul F. Stapel" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 17:10:48 -0400 At 08:11 AM 8/15/97 -0500, you wrote: >I'm wondering what would be the best material to use to line the walls of a >pipe chamber in order that it be as "reflective" as possible. methinks anything that has been thoroughly sealed will work fine -- masonite is fairly cheap, give it a good seal coat and back it up with thick underlay, dry wall, plywood, etc. the angles involved are indeed more or at least, as, important as the reflectivity. And all of that is equally as important as the room's reflectivity Good luck! Paul Stapel
(back) Subject: Re: No Subject From: Ronnymn@aol.com Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 18:42:57 -0400 (EDT) I just happened to come from the NE organist page and went to organ builders and they had a couple possible sources under electronic--one was Classic Organ Works. incidentally, they have a free download to design your own organ counsel. interesting http://www.tneorg.com/
(back) Subject: Re: Best Lining for Pipe Chambers? Any thoughts? From: CDKrug@aol.com Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 23:07:30 -0400 (EDT) Sheet rock not reflective enough? Concrete board actually has a fairly rough surface(better for tile cement). In that case, try 1/2" sheet steel. That oughta do the trick. More seriously, I don't think you could go far wrong with gypsym wallboard--though furnature grade birch plywood might give you a bit more organic sound Charles. > Asbestos is natural > Benzene is organic > Try our new asbestos chips w/ benzene sauce! > Their natural and organic!