PipeChat Digest #682 - Saturday, January 30, 1999
 
Re: Tracker Touch keyboards
  by "Stephen Karr" <sfpkarr@hotmail.com>
Fw: Tracker Touch keyboards
  by "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net>
(Re: Cheryl Hart's comments) OMG!
  by "Cheryl C Hart" <info@copemanhart.co.uk>
Re: Schopp's in Ohio
  by <Butler425@aol.com>
Re: (Re: Cheryl Hart's comments) and Marva Dawn Book
  by <Hitkmus@aol.com>
Re: Schopp's in Ohio
  by <Butler425@aol.com>
Re: MP Moller Opus 4920, inst. 1927
  by <KS2S12@aol.com>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <George.Greene@rossnutrition.com>
Fw: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <Afreed0904@aol.com>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <Hitkmus@aol.com>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <JKVDP@aol.com>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <GRSCoLVR@aol.com>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by "JeffWinSTL" <Reedstop@worldnet.att.net>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by "JeffWinSTL" <Reedstop@worldnet.att.net>
Re: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by <GRSCoLVR@aol.com>
RE: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net>
RE: Happy Clappy, etc.
  by "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net>
Re: Dr. Ore
  by "Chris Mullen" <nascarfreak1039@hotmail.com>
Re: emotion vs knowledge
  by <Afreed0904@aol.com>
Re: Dr. Ore
  by <DudelK@aol.com>
Save the Austin addendum
  by "Frank Johnson" <usd465@horizon.hit.net>
RE: emotion vs knowledge
  by "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net>
-----Help! Save the AUSTIN
  by "Frank Johnson" <usd465@horizon.hit.net>
Re: Dr. Ore
  by "Mickey Shankland" <mrmouse@raex.com>
 


(back) Subject: Re: Tracker Touch keyboards From: "Stephen Karr" <sfpkarr@hotmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:56:00 EST   Hi, listers-   Jason Comet writes:   >Can you add a similated, cheap, tracker touch to present keyboards. >the touch is too light, I can't play cleanly, and I read on the >internet that some guy installed magnets in the keyboards to give >tracker touch.   I'd just like to say that, in my not so humble opinion, tracker touch is one of the least helpful innovations that I have run across in the field of organ building. So-called "tracker touch" is no more than (once again, in my own opinion) a device designed to make an electronic console (EP or fully electric) unnecessarily hard to play. It certainly does not add anything to my ability to play the instrument (and I do play one that has this feature on a regular basis). I appreciate the fact that you do have a greater control over the actual speech of the pipes with a true tracker action, and believe myself to be able to take some advantage of this unique quality, but I don't feel that tracker touch makes the console feel like it is that of a tracker, just that it's harder to play the keys.   'Scuse any rambling, but I was up doing laundry at 1:30 this morning, and I'm paying for it now, after two church services and a meeting.   -Stephen   ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com  
(back) Subject: Fw: Tracker Touch keyboards From: "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:40:52 -0500   Tracker-touch may not necessarily be for simulation only. I have played many instruments where the keys felt SO sluggish, ( how sluggish was it ! ! ! ), it was like playing in sloppy mud. Firm key action CAN improve ones technique--that is why, my instructor (many long years ago) and many others have recommended piano first, for accurate execution and delivery. Sloppy keys can lead to sloppy presentation (or words to that effect). Rick     -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Karr <sfpkarr@hotmail.com> To: pipechat@pipechat.org <pipechat@pipechat.org> Date: Friday, January 29, 1999 9:07 AM Subject: Re: Tracker Touch keyboards     >Hi, listers- > >Jason Comet writes: > >>Can you add a similated, cheap, tracker touch to present keyboards. >>the touch is too light, I can't play cleanly, and I read on the >>internet that some guy installed magnets in the keyboards to give >>tracker touch. > >I'd just like to say that, in my not so humble opinion, tracker touch is >one of the least helpful innovations that I have run across in the field >of organ building. So-called "tracker touch" is no more than (once >again, in my own opinion) a device designed to make an electronic >console (EP or fully electric) unnecessarily hard to play. It certainly >does not add anything to my ability to play the instrument (and I do >play one that has this feature on a regular basis). I appreciate the >fact that you do have a greater control over the actual speech of the >pipes with a true tracker action, and believe myself to be able to take >some advantage of this unique quality, but I don't feel that tracker >touch makes the console feel like it is that of a tracker, just that >it's harder to play the keys. > >'Scuse any rambling, but I was up doing laundry at 1:30 this morning, >and I'm paying for it now, after two church services and a meeting. > >-Stephen > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > >"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >      
(back) Subject: (Re: Cheryl Hart's comments) OMG! From: Cheryl C Hart <info@copemanhart.co.uk> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:02:35 +0000   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 28th January 1999   Greg, I feel honoured that you have given me a subject line all of my own! I am sorry if I have touched a raw nerve, for whatever reason, but I would venture to suggest that you have taken one phrase out of context and misread my meaning (which I would be the first to agree is not impossible, especially if one does not know me).   Thank you, Bud/Burgie, for so rightly and succinctly interpreting - I wish I had that gift - and Mark for the food analogy! With regard to Taize: I would not dream of questioning its inspiration, but it just does nothing for me. Doubtless someone will now think I am en route to perdition. ;-)   Recently, I have heard a little about the Iona service/experience, which is contemporary, cerebral and contemplative. Now that sounds good to me. Worth investigating.   Have a good weekend.   Cheryl     http://www.copemanhart.co.uk      
(back) Subject: Re: Schopp's in Ohio From: Butler425@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:48:38 EST   A quick check of the internet white pages revealed:   A.R. Schopps' Sons Inc. 1551 South Linden Avenue Alliance, Ohio 44601 330/821.8406   They rebuilt the reeds on our 1920 Austin a few years ago, and I am totally delighted with their work. Jim Butler  
(back) Subject: Re: (Re: Cheryl Hart's comments) and Marva Dawn Book From: Hitkmus@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:53:19 EST   Hi Cheryl:   I have been to Iona and the service I attended was lovely, indeed. Part of it, I'm sure was the whole experience of being in such a mysterious, spiritual place, with fog so thick you couldn't see two feet in front of your face, not to mention the whole ordeal of actually getting out there..what an adventure!   BTW for those of you who wrote me privately and asked the publisher of the Marva Dawn book, "Reaching Out Without Dumbing Down," it's: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Grand Rapids, Michigan.   Sincerely, Lynda Alexander  
(back) Subject: Re: Schopp's in Ohio From: Butler425@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:21:35 EST   In a message dated 01.29.99 12:01:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, Butler425@aol.com writes:   << A quick check of the internet white pages revealed: A.R. Schopps' Sons Inc. 1551 South Linden Avenue Alliance, Ohio 44601 330/821.8406 They rebuilt the reeds on our 1920 Austin a few years ago, and I am totally delighted with their work. Jim Butler "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >>  
(back) Subject: Re: MP Moller Opus 4920, inst. 1927 From: KS2S12@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:17:37 EST   Hi: Don't know if this is of any help in your research. We have a 1938 Moller in our shop, Opus 6550, which is 3 1/2 ranks. Hopefully it will be in my home in a couple of years. We are using it for a voicing machine right now. Shop is in Howell, NJ Paul E. Sojka  
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: George.Greene@rossnutrition.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:28:37 -0500     Scott wrote...   <<Funny- I still can't think of any positive aspects of it except for, possibly- paper to start a fire with.>>   Paper? PAPER? It's hard to find paper (i.e., hymnals) in churches these days! It infuriates me when I visit a church where the words are projected on the walls; I like to sing parts, and I need to see the NOTES in order to do that!     -George Greene    
(back) Subject: Fw: Happy Clappy, etc. From: "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:49:24 -0500   In regards to words projected on the wall without music... Just follow the BOUNCING BALL ! !     Rick     -----Original Message----- From: George.Greene@rossnutrition.com <George.Greene@rossnutrition.com> To: - (052)pipechat(a)pipechat.org <pipechat@pipechat.org> Date: Friday, January 29, 1999 3:30 PM Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc.     > >Scott wrote... > ><<Funny- I still can't think of any positive aspects of it except for, >possibly- paper to start a fire with.>> > >Paper? PAPER? It's hard to find paper (i.e., hymnals) in churches these >days! >It infuriates me when I visit a church where the words are projected on the >walls; I like to sing parts, and I need to see the NOTES in order to do that! > > >-George Greene > > >"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >      
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: Afreed0904@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:40:14 EST     In a message dated 1/29/99 3:31:42 PM, George.Greene@rossnutrition.com writes:   >It infuriates me when I visit a church where the words are projected on >the >walls; I like to sing parts, and I need to see the NOTES in order to do >that! >   Me too, George. And what's more, I want to be ABLE, at least, to read over the texts, and maybe check out the bass part, before the service begins, at home or in the church, and maybe look at them again on Tuesday. Hey, Gertie! Fire up the projector! I want to meditate! (Ridiculous.)   Alan Freed  
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: Hitkmus@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:15:35 EST   I simply need to "feel" a hymnal in my hands! Lynda  
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: JKVDP@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:54:45 EST   Words projected on the wall have both good and bad parts.   1. GOOD people don't have their noses DOWN in the hymnal. 2. BAD the lack of notes contributes to the alarming rise in musical illiteracy! 3. BAD You can't view the text as a whole. 4. BAD You can't read the text in advance.   A friend recently identifed contemporary Christian music as that which does not use an organ and is not sung from a hymnal.   Jerry in Seattle  
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: GRSCoLVR@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:57:27 EST   Hi George and list! WORDS projected on WALLS???????? OMG! I guess I am outta touch with the "modern day" world. Would one suppose that along with the wall projection, one would also get the "bouncing ball" to follow the words, and does this also suppose that the organists music rack is a computer screen that has the notes for the hymn being shown on it,,along with time elapsed since it began,,,projected amount of time till the currently being played tune ends,,,etc. etc. Part of my growing up and attending church was the feel of a heavy hymnal, sharing it with others, and it seemed to me and still seems to me to be a part of my worship service. What does one do in the wall projection scenerio? Hold ones hands in the attitude of holding a hymnal? Seems like that would be the safest for ME, would keep ME from getting too "happy clappy( note the reference to ONE individual, NOT a blanket statement). Hmmmmmmmm, do you suppose that is the reason for having hymn word projection on a wall,,,,Hmmmm,,,it does keep hands free for clapping,,,,   Regards, --Roc  
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: "JeffWinSTL" <Reedstop@worldnet.att.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:23:19 -0600   >Words projected on the wall have both good and bad parts.   >1. GOOD people don't have their noses DOWN in the hymnal.     But, they could hold their hymnals UP and sing out! (GRIN)   >4. BAD You can't read the text in advance.     And true, not to mention that what if you want to omit verses, or even (gasp) add some? Plus there's the whole copyright deal, which granted isn't hard to get, but for our church, it's an extra expense we don't need. Fortunately this is NOT an issue with us.   >A friend recently identifed contemporary Christian music as that which does >not use an organ and is not sung from a hymnal.     Probably the best I've heard. However, just to add to the mix: Amy Grant's "Thy Word" is in our hymnal companion called "All God's People Sing" (CPH). I consider that song to be CCM, also. I do play it on the organ, though. This is a really interesting topic, because the area between Contemporary (and I hate that word) and traditional (I'm not sure this is much better) is soooo grey. I admit, I get a bit nervous when I hear "Praise Team" and such. OTOH, my nervousness comes from seeing the organ and hymnal slowly dying across America. The WORST thing I ever heard was the following quote: "[such and such] Church is building a new building, and they're not even putting an organ in...only synthesizers." Excuse me while I clutch my chest and keel over.   A church in west St. Louis built a new building not too long ago. Despite moving the tracker Zimmer (which they electrified), it was told to me they dont' use it as much (except at 8). The church was built in "theatre-style" fashion, which seats a huge number of people. They have that projection system. While it's great for performances IMHO, it just didn't feel like a church. Give me "cathedral-style" any day.   (Donning asbestos underwear, but it's how I feel. Fire away.) <GRIN>   Jeff          
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: "JeffWinSTL" <Reedstop@worldnet.att.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:24:43 -0600   >Hi George and list! > WORDS projected on WALLS???????? OMG! I guess I am outta touch with the >"modern day" world. Would one suppose that along with the wall projection, >one would also get the "bouncing ball" to follow the words, and does this also >suppose that the organists music rack is a computer screen .....<snip>   Organist?   I guess that's not a fair comment. Do the "traditional" services make use of the same system? One other question....how do the elderly and folks who don't see so well fare? I'm really curious.   Jeff    
(back) Subject: Re: Happy Clappy, etc. From: GRSCoLVR@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:23:33 EST   Sorry,,,I have to disagree with you on your one good point of reading off a wall versus a book. In my situation, one was expected to hold the book up high,,,and project ones voice outward. This did not make for having one's nose buried in the hymnal. The same principle obtained in our children's choir school, where the students were taught to hold their books and anthems up high in 4th grade!!!!! Ahhh,, -----only SOME change is good,,,IMHO!!!!!!!!!!   Regards, --Roc  
(back) Subject: RE: Happy Clappy, etc. From: "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:37:55 -0700   > OTOH, my nervousness comes from seeing the organ and > hymnal slowly > dying across America. The WORST thing I ever heard was the > following quote: > "[such and such] Church is building a new building, and > they're not even > putting an organ in...only synthesizers."   The church that used to have my AOB built a new building -- no organ. And it's (at least in name) a Lutheran church.   I guess I see both sides of the street . . . I play for a traditional church, but attend a church that projects words on the wall -- no bouncing ball -- . In fact, the software they use, I wrote it. That's what I feature on my business web page at http://www.desertsoft.net.   It has a lot of faults, but there's a segment of the human race that will never darken the door of a traditional church. Thank God there's someplace that they will go to and learn of God. While the music traditions of the "happy clappy" set may not be the best, most of those churches are strong on the bible -- many of them more so than some of our old line churches.   The word says to worship in spirit and in truth, and we as musicians are not the ones who decide for the individual believer if their worship experience is "in spirit and in truth". I do believe that God allows many ways to worship Him so that we can all approach the Throne of Grace in some way that's right for us. I don't think any one denomination has the patent on the right way.   Dennis    
(back) Subject: RE: Happy Clappy, etc. From: "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:41:10 -0700   One other question....how do the elderly > and folks who > don't see so well fare?       BBB I GGGGGGGG B B I G B B I G B B I G BBB I G B B I G GGGG B B I G G B B I G G BBB I GGGGGGGG     PRINT!   Dennis  
(back) Subject: Re: Dr. Ore From: "Chris Mullen" <nascarfreak1039@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 08:31:51 PST       I AM I AM!!!!! ;-)       >I'm curious to find out how many people are familiar with Dr. Charles W. >Ore, and his music. > >Travis Evans > >tle6399@seward.cune.edu > >"When I hear music, I fear no evil" > > >"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >     ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com  
(back) Subject: Re: emotion vs knowledge From: Afreed0904@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 21:58:51 EST     In a message dated 1.28.99 2:30:47 PM, dgoward@uswest.net writes:   <<Forgive me on the exact quotes. Perhaps Alan can bail me out here.>>   What? Bible? But we have the Augsburg Confession! Who needs a Bible?   (Seriously, I'll try to give it a look in a day or two, but I've got 964 letters in my box at the mo, so can't get to it tonight. But the question is worth the effort!)   Alan  
(back) Subject: Re: Dr. Ore From: DudelK@aol.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 22:07:06 EST   In a message dated 99-01-29 20:51:01 EST, you write:   << >I'm curious to find out how many people are familiar with Dr. Charles W. >Ore, and his music. >>   I studied with him at Concordia, River Forest, a long, long time ago -- I think it was the 1961-62 school year. I recall him as being very patient and encouraging unlike some of his colleagues there at that time. Haven't heard much of him since, nor am I familiar with his music.   Dudel/David  
(back) Subject: Save the Austin addendum From: usd465@horizon.hit.net (Frank Johnson) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 21:19:35 -0600   The four ranks are:   Open Diapason Gedeckt Viole Dulciana   Here is the stop list:   Pedal: Bourdon 16' Contra Dolce 16' Open Diapason 8' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8' Dulciana 8' Octave 4' Flute 4'   Swell 4 presets Contra Dolce 16' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8 Dulciana 8' Flute D'Amour 4' Violin 4' Dulcet 4' Quintette 2 2/3' Flautina 2' Tremolo   Great 4 presets Bourdon 16' Open Diapason 8' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8' Dulciana 8' Octave 4' Flute D'Amour 4' Violin 4' Dulcet 4' Flautina 4'   I have several pictures. If anyone would like, I'll send them as an attachment to your e-mail address.   Frank R. Johnson (KA0API) Spirit of New Orleans - clarinet/leader http://www.hit.net/~usd465/ 1922 E. 14th Winfield, KS 67156   Frank R. Johnson (KA0API) Spirit of New Orleans - clarinet/leader http://www.hit.net/~usd465/ 1922 E. 14th Winfield, KS 67156      
(back) Subject: RE: emotion vs knowledge From: "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@uswest.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:25:42 -0700   > (Seriously, I'll try to give it a look in a day or two, but I've got 964 > letters in my box at the mo, so can't get to it tonight. But the > question is > worth the effort!) > > Alan >   Ain't it like the organist to dump it on the pastor? I'm bad!   D  
(back) Subject: -----Help! Save the AUSTIN From: usd465@horizon.hit.net (Frank Johnson) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 21:36:11 -0600   I'll try and make this as short as possible. I am a organ lover/buff and play mostly for my own amusement and amazement....like some people sing in the shower. I am a musician, instrumental music teacher, have my own dixieland group (I play clarinet) and direct the 104 year old Winfield (Kansas) Municipal Band. The band is in the process of moving into an old building on the campus of the defunct Lutheran College, St. John's College. There was a large organ in the auditorium and it was moved to another Lutheran college somewhere. Still in basement of the building where the band is to have our home is a 2/4 Austin practice organ. According to the Austin Opus list, Opus 733 was originally installed in a 1st Pres. church in Nowota, Oklahoma. It was called a Chorophone according to my correspondance with the Austin company. Due to the fact that the building will be gutted and then completely remodeled, we have less than 30 days to remove the organ OR it will be 'bulldozed' along with the rest of the inside of the building. We would like to see the instrument used in the small auditorium (seating about 300). Winfield has a population of about 13,000 and has always been an very musical community. There are 5 or 6 of us that want to save the Austin. I know it is small but the thought of an organ being destroyed really upsets me. This is where I need some advice/help. I welcome any and all suggestions. In order not to make this mail list become clogged with suggestions. You may send your replys to: usd465@horizon.hit.net   We have another very fine small Methodist college here. The organ instructor is one of those interested in preserving the Austin. The removal, while it would be a big task, would be somewhat earier due to the fact that although it is in the basement, it is a half basement and has very large windows, the middle of which are about ground level. Are there any grants available for the "saving of organs?" Would the AGO have any ideas that might be of help? Please respond if you have any ideas, suggestions, or guidance. The city owns the property and it has been indicated that they would give us the organ if it were to stay in town. Otherwise they would like to get something out of it. I assure all suggestions will be considered. Our order of perference for the organ is:   1. Installed in the St. John's auditorium 2. Installed in Winfield 3. Sold to someone who would make good use of it.   The last thing we want is to see it destroyed.   I hope this post is clear enough but if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask. If I don't know the answer I'll find someone who does know.   Thank you for your time.     The four ranks are:   Open Diapason Gedeckt Viole Dulciana   Here is the stop list:   Pedal: Bourdon 16' Contra Dolce 16' Open Diapason 8' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8' Dulciana 8' Octave 4' Flute 4'   Swell 4 presets Contra Dolce 16' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8 Dulciana 8' Flute D'Amour 4' Violin 4' Dulcet 4' Quintette 2 2/3' Flautina 2' Tremolo   Great 4 presets Bourdon 16' Open Diapason 8' Gedeckt 8' Viole 8' Dulciana 8' Octave 4' Flute D'Amour 4' Violin 4' Dulcet 4' Flautina 4'   I have several pictures. If anyone would like, I'll send them as an attachment to your e-mail address.   Frank R. Johnson (KA0API) Spirit of New Orleans - clarinet/leader http://www.hit.net/~usd465/ 1922 E. 14th Winfield, KS 67156   Frank R. Johnson (KA0API) Spirit of New Orleans - clarinet/leader http://www.hit.net/~usd465/ 1922 E. 14th Winfield, KS 67156      
(back) Subject: Re: Dr. Ore From: "Mickey Shankland" <mrmouse@raex.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 00:19:28 -0500   Dr. Ore has several organ and choral things published by Augsburg/Fortress. I have attended several clinics he has done for them. I think he is published by several other publishers too.   :-) Mickey Shankland, Organist at Church of the Master in Akron , Ohio. -----Original Message----- From: DudelK@aol.com <DudelK@aol.com> To: pipechat@pipechat.org <pipechat@pipechat.org> Date: Friday, January 29, 1999 10:08 PM Subject: Re: Dr. Ore     >In a message dated 99-01-29 20:51:01 EST, you write: > ><< > >I'm curious to find out how many people are familiar with Dr. Charles > W. > >Ore, and his music. >> > >I studied with him at Concordia, River Forest, a long, long time ago -- I >think it was the 1961-62 school year. I recall him as being very patient and >encouraging unlike some of his colleagues there at that time. Haven't heard >much of him since, nor am I familiar with his music. > >Dudel/David > >"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >