PipeChat Digest #945 - Sunday, June 20, 1999
 
Re: PipeChat Digest #943 - 06/19/99
  by "Brad Cunningham" <bradfordco@mindspring.com>
 


(back) Subject: Re: PipeChat Digest #943 - 06/19/99 From: Brad Cunningham <bradfordco@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 01:24:30 +0000   Please disconnect me.         At 10:02 PM 6/19/99 -0500, you wrote: >PipeChat Digest #943 - Saturday, June 19, 1999 > > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by "Stanley E Yoder" <syoder+@andrew.cmu.edu> > Durn grammer! > by "Robert Horton" <GEMSHORN@UKANS.EDU> > Re: Durn grammer! > by "Randolph Runyon" <runyonr@muohio.edu> > Re: PipeChat Digest #939 - 06/19/99 > by "Bruce Behnke" <behnke@lvcm.com> > Re: Durn grammer! > by "Robert Horton" <GEMSHORN@UKANS.EDU> > Re: Half-trained organists who juts get by in Church. > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: Half-trained organists who juts get by in Church. > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: hymn-playing, etc. > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: sung vs said > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: treatment of choirs > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Hurray! > by "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> > Re: hymn-playing, etc. > by <JKVDP@aol.com> > Re: Music, Church, Sport, Amateurism, Professionalism. > by <JKVDP@aol.com> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by <JKVDP@aol.com> > Fw: Hurray! > by "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by "Randolph Runyon" <runyonr@muohio.edu> > writing and pointing > by "Bud/burgie" <budchris@earthlink.net> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by <DRAWKNOB@aol.com> > Crystal Cathedral on Astra > by "John Winn" <john@jwinn.demon.co.uk> > RE: Half-trained organists vs. no organist > by "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@worldnet.att.net> > Re: Hurray! > by <GRSCoLVR@aol.com> > Re: Durn grammer! > by "Stanley E Yoder" <syoder+@andrew.cmu.edu> > Somewhat Empty Truck looking for move (X-Posted) > by "Richard Schneider" <arpncorn@davesworld.net> > Mail Filters for Netscape > by "Richard Schneider" <arpncorn@davesworld.net> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by <DRAWKNOB@aol.com> > requests > by <ComposerTX@aol.com> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by "N Brown" <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> > vocal descants needed/wanted > by "Bud/burgie" <budchris@earthlink.net> > Re: volunteer vs paid organists > by "N Brown" <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> > Re: virtuosic hymn-playing, etc. > by "N Brown" <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> > Re: Royal Wedding Music > by "N Brown" <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> > Re: Hurray! > by "N Brown" <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: Stanley E Yoder <syoder+@andrew.cmu.edu> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:47:46 -0400 (EDT) > >The wedding was shown on The Learning Channel (TLC), and will be >repeated at 9PM and Midnight tonight, Eastern time. Great camera work. > >One of the anthems was Elgar's 'The Spirit of the Lord', which caused >that exhilarating feeling of "We've done that!" (in our parish). >Stan Yoder >Pittsburgh > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Durn grammer! >From: Robert Horton <GEMSHORN@UKANS.EDU> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:13:07 -0600 > >> That being said, the $68 dollar question is, what are/can we going >>to do about it? >Wow, me sure good speaking English today! > >Let's try that again. >>...That being said, what are we going to do about it, or is there even >>anything we can do >about it. > >Rob > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Durn grammer! >From: runyonr@muohio.edu (Randolph Runyon) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:16:10 -0500 > >>> That being said, the $68 dollar question is, what are/can we going >>>to do about it? >>Wow, me sure good speaking English today! >> >>Let's try that again. >>>...That being said, what are we going to do about it, or is there even >>>anything we can do >about it. >> >>Rob >> >As long as you're correcting your grammar, you might want to correct your >math. I believe the question was worth only 64$. ;-) > >R. Runyon > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: PipeChat Digest #939 - 06/19/99 >From: Bruce Behnke <behnke@lvcm.com> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 99 11:33:54 -0700 > >Would you folks PLEEEEEEEASE learn how to reply to a post without >repeating the entire blankety-blank thing right down to the: > >>"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >> P etc. > >It is getting absolutely ridiculous. > >Bruce > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Durn grammer! >From: Robert Horton <GEMSHORN@UKANS.EDU> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:47:02 -0600 > >R. Runyon wrote: >>As long as you're correcting your grammar, you might want to correct = your >>math. I believe the question was worth only 64$. ;-) > >Inflation...;-) > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Half-trained organists who juts get by in Church. >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:29:55 +0100 > >>Speaking as a half-trained organist who just "gets by" in Church >>I would like to express the opinion that half-trained organists who >>just get by in Church do a very great deal to make sure that >>many Churches who could not obtain the services of a professional >>organist due either to lack of funds or availability can at least >>have the services of a half-trained organist who just gets by in church. > > >I can't agree more. I recently went on an RSCM (Royal School of Church >Music) coarse entitled "Accompanying a Service". It was taken by Andrew >Parnell, the assistant at St Albans Abbey, and a great organist. On this >coarse there was me, and a friend, and the rest were "Half Trained >Organists" (I know that I and my friend are too, but I mean 1/2 trained = as >in just get by at a church). These people, although not amazing musicians >obviously hold their church services together, and do good jobs. Anyway, = it >isn't just how trained you are in places like that, but your experience = that >count. > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Half-trained organists who juts get by in Church. >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:36:53 +0100 > >>I can't image a concert-level organist wanting to be in a church = situation. >>I don't recall that Arturo Toscanini conducting community choruses or >>Vladimir Horowitz accompanying them. > > >I am not being rude, but what rubbish. What you meant to say was "most >concert level organists have church jobs". In England, the concert only >organists can be counted on the fingers of one hand. One or two made it = to >the top of the church jobs and turned concert only - but only 'cause they >can afford to. You just have to look who is in charge of many of the >Cathedrals to find many excellent organists. > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: hymn-playing, etc. >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:49:32 +0100 > >>Worcestershire. >> >>Right in the middle. >> >>Evensong usually commands a Congregation of >>between 40 - 60, plus about 30 - 35 in the Choir. >> >>It's by far the best attended service - alas; they're >>not very Eucharistic. Only a TINY village. >> >>Mark Checkley. > > >Congratulations on that! We are the Civic church for Northampton, and we = are >lucky to get 30 at a service 0 most of the time the choir outnumber the >congregation - shame. > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:07:48 +0100 > >>I believe that a week from this Saturday there will be a royal wedding = at >St. >>George's Chapel, Windsor. Will it be broadcast, televised? Does = anyone >>know the music planned or any websites giving info? >>Jerry in Seattle > > >I watched it live - nice service. The only "bloop" (although it doesn't >really matter) was that as Sophie arrived the brass played a fanfare - = all >fine and good. Then the organ voluntary started (March Eroique - Brewer), >but it was a semi-tone higher. You would have thought that as the fanfare >was written for the occasion that the composer could have written it up a >semi-tone!!! > >Richard. > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: sung vs said >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:13:41 +0100 > >>If I'm not mistaken, the 1662 ENGLISH Prayer Book calls it Mattins and >>Evensong, whether it's said OR sung. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Bud >> > > >It gets confusing when it is sung and called Evening Prayer (which does >happen!!) > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: treatment of choirs >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:19:23 +0100 > >It is not the treatment of choirs we should be talking about, it is the = way >they treat us! >Lay-clerks at Cathedrals are particularly notorious. My organ teacher = told >me a story about a recording sessions last year when he was the organ >scholar at St Paul's. The session was scheduled from (I think) 7-9pm. At = 9pm >they were half way through the last take of the evening - the lay-clerks >just walked out. Why couldn't the have waited 30 seconds to finish the = take. >Barmy! > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Hurray! >From: "Richard Pinel" <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:43:41 +0100 > > >Dear List, > >I thought that I would post a happy posting for you all! > >I have just been told that I am to be the Organ Scholar at All Saints >starting September (I will probably sing a bit there still too). This is >because the current organ scholar isn't terribly good (I don't mean half >trained - he just isn't right for such a big church). Anyway I am really >happy so none of your insulting posts can annoy me!!! :-) > >Richard > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: hymn-playing, etc. >From: JKVDP@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:48:49 EDT > >In a message dated 99-06-19 12:01:06 EDT, xcs53@dial.pipex.com writes: > ><< Where I do NOT agree with you is in your seemingly single-minded > view that the way to improve standards is to PAY MONEY and > HIRE PROFESSIONALS. >> > >I believe all of us should at least do some volunteer work. I am paid = quite >well for a little work on Thursday evenings and Sunday mornings in a = suburban >Presbyterian Church. Then I volunteer on alternate Sunday evenings in the =   >small town church in which my wife and I hold membership. >Jerry in Seattle > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Music, Church, Sport, Amateurism, Professionalism. >From: JKVDP@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:48:50 EDT > >In a message dated 99-06-19 12:36:32 EDT, xcs53@dial.pipex.com writes: > ><< This is very different from England, where every village has its > cricket team, and all but the smallest have Rugby and Soccer teams > as well - all playing in local leagues, for fun, on Staurday afternoons. > (These are grown men, not children / teenagers). >> >Sadly in North America Soccer for teens now takes place on Sunday = Mornings so >for a few months each year certain families are missing from church and = choir >because of soccer committments. >Jerry in Seattle > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: JKVDP@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:48:51 EDT > >In a message dated 99-06-19 12:51:51 EDT, douglas@blackiris.com writes: > ><< Anthem - The Spirit Of The Lord - Elgar > >I loved hearing the "Prologue" to t"he Apostles", but what makes this >appropriate for weddings? >Jerry > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Fw: Hurray! >From: "VEAGUE" <dutchorgan@svs.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:18:46 -0500 > >Congrats, Richard. > >Rick V. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard Pinel <rpinelchat@musicman123.freeserve.co.uk> >To: PipeChat <pipechat@pipechat.org> >Date: Saturday, June 19, 1999 1:58 PM >Subject: Hurray! > > >> >>Dear List, >> >>I thought that I would post a happy posting for you all! >> >>I have just been told that I am to be the Organ Scholar at All Saints >>starting September (I will probably sing a bit there still too). This is >>because the current organ scholar isn't terribly good (I don't mean half >>trained - he just isn't right for such a big church). Anyway I am really >>happy so none of your insulting posts can annoy me!!! :-) >> >>Richard >> >> >>"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >>PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >>HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >>List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >>Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org >> > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: runyonr@muohio.edu (Randolph Runyon) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 15:29:30 -0500 > >>In a message dated 99-06-19 12:51:51 EDT, douglas@blackiris.com writes: >> >><< Anthem - The Spirit Of The Lord - Elgar >> >>I loved hearing the "Prologue" to t"he Apostles", but what makes this >>appropriate for weddings? >>Jerry >> >Pardon my ignorance, but if Elgar's "The Spirit of the Lord" is the same >thing as the "Prologue" to "The Apostles", then I understand your = question >to be what makes "The Spirit of the Lord" appropriate for weddings. I >think it is appropriate for this particular wedding. I read it >politically. Sophie is a sosie (i.e., "look-alike") for the late Diana. >Most people can't look at her and not say, Why she looks just like Diana. >The text of the anthem, I think, is Luke 4. 18: "The Spirit of the Lord = is >upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the good news to the poor; >he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the >capitives, and the recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty = them >that are bruised," etc. I don't have a copy of Elgar's anthem in front = of >me, and his text may be somewhat different, but I believe that is the = basic >sense. Diana was eulogized for her ability to connect with the common >folk, particularly with the poor. They called her the People's Princess. >I think that is the hidden agenda behind the choice of anthem. The royal >family want to give the appearance of acknowledging Diana's common touch. >Or if not the royal family, then whoever in the church picked the anthem. >There's almost always a message in the choices we make, often = unconsciously >so. This wedding, as a public spectacle, is meant to heal the >brokenhearted who miss the late Princess, and to acknowledge the enormous >gap between the wealthy royals and the poor masses, a gap evidently once >bridged by the princess to whom Sophie bears so striking a physical >resemblance. Hence the remarkable appropriateness of the anthem. I take >this in a positive sense, by the way, cynic though I normally am. > >R. Runyon > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: writing and pointing >From: Bud/burgie <budchris@earthlink.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 12:30:52 -0700 > > > >Mark Checkley wrote: > >> Bud, >> >> I can't see why you have to spend all that time WRITING Music ? >> Is your liturgy unique, so there are no "standard settings" of the = things >> you need ? I would have thought, in your sort of Church, that there >> would at least be Plainsong tones for just about everything you >> need. However, if you say it is necessary, then it obviously is; you're >> the one on the spot. > >For two reasons: first, the Propers of the Mass were never sung by the = majority >of Anglican churches. There are but two settings: the English Gradual, = Part II, >by the late Francis Burgess, which sets them (badly) to the same five >psalm-tones for the entire year ... the plates are so worn that the last = set we >bought were unreadable in places. The other setting is the monumental Plainchant >Gradual by the late Rev'd Dr. G.H. Palmer, late chaplain to the Convent = of St. >Mary, Wantage, Oxfordshire ... the full Gregorian melodies of the = Graduale >Romanum set to English texts. BUT ... Palmer is in GREGORIAN notation. > >There's nothing in between, unlike the pre-Vatican II RC church, which = had >settings of the Propers running the gamut from Isaac (Choralis = Constantinus) to >Byrd (Gradualia) to Palestrina (the Offertories, at least) to Griesbacher = (what >R. Wagner would have written if somebody had given him a BAD hit of LSD = [grin] >... they're so awful they're FUN) to Father Rossini (psalm-tones, but a = better >variety) and A. Edmonds Tozer (simple fauxbourdons). > >So ... we sing a l bit of Chant (the Communions and the Alleluia = melodies), a >bit of fauxbourdons (the Introits and the Alleluia Verse), a bit of = Anglican >chant (the Gradual -- we sing a full Psalm, and also a full Psalm with = the >Communion) and a bit of the solemn and simple psalmody (whenever I don't = feel >like writing out something else, or whenever I don't have a full choir). > >In addition, we DON'T stick strictly to the texts of the Anglican Missal all the >time, so there are many texts that don't have settings, either in the Burgess OR >the Palmer. > >The choir only uses the Burgess when I'm on holiday ... the cantor can = lead them >in those without the organ, since nobody seems to be able to improvise >accompaniments to the tones (sigh). > >In a burst of heaven-knows-what, I DID teach them to read Gregorian = notes, and >they have great fun with it, but, except for the Communions and the = Alleluias, >the chants are simply too LONG in our present situation ... we seldom = have >incense because of the low ceiling in the chapel ... so there's not a = need for a >five or ten-minute introit, except when the Archbishop comes to call (grin). Nor >is there a great long Gospel procession. We DO sing for 15-20 minutes = straight >at Communion-time ... that's why we add a complete Psalm. > >But the MAIN reason I do so much writing will probably scandalize you: = the >reading of pointing is virtually a lost art in this country. When the = American >Episcopal Church dropped Mattins as the principal service on Sundays = twenty or >thirty years ago, everybody forgot how to read it. With limited rehearsal = time, >I find it easier to write everything out, verse by verse, rather than = teaching >them to read pointing. As a result, our Anglican chanting is VERY = accurate and >rather more flexible than what one finds in the various Psalters ... and = I've >yet to find one that I liked well enough to adopt in any case. > >I DO include the pointing with the words of each verse, along with the music, so >they ARE picking it up little by little; on the rare occasion when they = DO have >to sing from just pointed words, they CAN do it, at least to a few = familiar >chants. > >That's another difference between the U.S. and Britain ... the orderly = chanting >of the Psalter never got established, except in a VERY few cathedral = churches >and the seminaries, so there's no tradition of it. I've taught my = CONGREGATION >to read pointed psalms in the service leaflet (led by the choir, who has the >written-out version in front of them), and the people are proud as punch = that >they can sing psalms (grin).The congregation at early Mass can even do it >without the choir, as long as I stick to the old chants that were = formerly used >for the canticles at Mattins ... there was one set that seemed to be sung >virtually everywhere. > >So I produce a LOT of material, particularly when you add in the psalms = and >canticles for Mattins and Evensong for the seminarians, which have to be written >in Gregorian notation, since they have to learn it in order to sing Mass = from >the Missal. > >> Whilst I agree that less kiddies learn Piano these days than did "when = I >> was a boy", I am shocked to learn that that is the situation in an = affluent >> neighbourhood. Are you sure you've got it right ? Have you met and = talked >> this over with the principles of your local schools ? > >I wrote to and/or spoke with every single junior and senior high school = in the >area, looking for both singers and keyboard players. Nothing ... > >It's all soccer and Little League baseball and Pop Warner football and = heaven >knows what else ... my cantor has five kids, and he's forever being late because >of some sports game or other. Sports mania RULES in the U.S. to a degree = that I >imagine is unknown in Britain. Some churches even reschedule their = SERVICES on >Super Bowl Sunday (!). > >Cheers, > >Bud > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: DRAWKNOB@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 16:41:02 EDT > >In a message dated 6/19/99 7:06:29 AM Central Daylight Time, >organist@x-stream.co.uk writes: > ><< I really DON'T think you meant to say that, did you? >> > >"If it was not so I would not have told you so." :-) > >John > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Crystal Cathedral on Astra >From: "John Winn" <john@jwinn.demon.co.uk> >Date: 19 Jun 99 20:43:26 +0200 > >For those in the UK and Europe who want to see what the Crystal >Cathedral is like it is on transponder 50 - CNBC - of the Astra >Satellite from 8am to 9am (BST) 9am to 10am CET on Sunday mornings. >At present they are running recordings made in January. > >It is certainly an impressive building and a wonderful organ though I >would think it suffers from some horrendous temperature changes. > >If anyone can receive Astra and wants tuning details contact me >privately. > >Regards, > >John > >-- >John Winn > >Upminster, England > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: RE: Half-trained organists vs. no organist >From: "Dennis Goward" <dgoward@worldnet.att.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:20:36 -0700 > >> Oh, how I'd love to hear Amy Grant AND Sandi Patti sing "Messiah". It >> would be as much fun as watching the carollers merrily running through >> the "accidently activated" lawn sprinklers. I'm sure the duets would >> be absolutely, er, memorable!! > >Like the sound of the book at the end of Good Friday, we hear the sound = of a >mind shutting! > >For the record, Sandi Patti has a range to rival any operatic soprano. = I'm >sure she would do an excellent job with Messiah. > >Dennis > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Hurray! >From: GRSCoLVR@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:38:48 EDT > >Richard--- >CONGRATS on your upcoming "promotion". I was very very glad to read of = that >in your post. Best of luck to you, in all the endeavors. >Cheers, >---Roc > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Durn grammer! >From: Stanley E Yoder <syoder+@andrew.cmu.edu> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:53:58 -0400 (EDT) > >Excerpts from mail: 19-Jun-99 Durn grammer! by Robert Horton@UKANS.EDU >> Let's try that again. >> >...That being said, what are we going to do about it, or is there even >> >anything we can do >about it. >> > >Not to put too fine a point on it, but how about a "?" at the end of duh >zentence? >Stan Yoder >Pittsburgh > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Somewhat Empty Truck looking for move (X-Posted) >From: Richard Schneider <arpncorn@davesworld.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 16:40:24 -0700 > >Rev. Robert Linnstaedt <Linnstaedt@aol.com> forwarded the following >message to the ROS list from Dave Smith M<outback@mkl.com> > >> I have a couple different trucks passing through my area, the first or >> second week of July that will be returning empty. > >I thought I might add that I will be in somewhat the same position, as I >have to go to Aberdeen, SD in a week or so to remove a pipe organ to >bring back here. While we will have to fill our 24' truck with some >supplies and Pipe Trays to effect the move, it may be possible to put a >Reed Organ or a Piano into the back, for a possible stop-over anywhere >(reasonable, of course) between Kenney (Central) IL, and Aberdeen, >prolly via Iowa and southern Minnesota (I-90). > >Anyone having anything needing moved in that direction, please let me >know privately. > >THANKS! > >Faithfully, > >Richard Schneider, President >SCHNEIDER PIPE ORGANS, Inc. >Organbuilders >41-43 Johnston Street >Post Office Box 137 >Kenney, IL 61749-0137 >(217) 944-2454 VOX >(217) 944-2527 FAX >mailto:arpncorn@davesworld.net EMAIL (Note change in ISP's Domain-Name!) > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Mail Filters for Netscape >From: Richard Schneider <arpncorn@davesworld.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:50:15 -0700 > >Bud Clark wrote: > >> How do I set my e-mail so as not to receive further postings from Bruce >> Cornely? > >Dr. Pete Replied: > >> It al depends on what email software you are using. If you are using >> Netscape, I am not sure if it handles filters, proabably not. > >Yes it does. At least my version does. I think the latest Communicator >version I have at home does also, but I'd have to check. (I can't >imagine them taking away a feature if it exists in earlier versions!) > >If you go into the EDIT window, there is a heading for MAIL FILTERS >towards the bottom of the list. Click on NEW to create a new filter, >then give the filter a name (in this case, Cornley), then select "if the >sender" of the message (next multiple choice window) "is" (then type in) >"Bruce Cornley" <and his email address" then "move to folder" "trash" >and that's all there is to it. In this way, you can easily set-up the >filter to delete EMAILS from individual posters of whatever name you >choose. You can also use it to automatically sort incoming mail to >specific mailboxes you set up. > >Hope this helps! > >Faithfully, > >"Arp" > >Rich Schneider >SCHNEIDER PIPE ORGANS, Inc. >Organbuilders >41-43 Johnston Street >Post Office Box 137 >Kenney, IL 61749-0137 >(217) 944-2454 VOX >(217) 944-2527 FAX >mailto:arpncorn@davesworld.net EMAIL (Note change in ISP's Domain-Name!) > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: DRAWKNOB@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:56:04 EDT > >If anyone has satellite television BBC America has been running = rebroadcasts >of the Royal wedding today. Furthermore, for information regarding this >Royal wedding and previous ones visit this website: BBCAmerica.com > >John > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: requests >From: ComposerTX@aol.com >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:03:47 EDT > >requests@pipechat.org >unsubscribe > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: Innkawgneeto@webtv.net (N Brown) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:33:04 -0400 (EDT) > > > >>Especially since HRH Prince Edward is not "quite" the marrying >type!<< > >Her highness, the Ms. Rhys-Jones (pardon if spelled wrongly) thinks he >is. Just one question: Is she related to the chap that was the sole >survivor of a famous Paris traffic accident? --Neil > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: vocal descants needed/wanted >From: Bud/burgie <budchris@earthlink.net> >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:33:04 -0700 > >I let my collection of descant books get away from me when I broke up >housekeeping in San Diego. I'm afraid most of them were out of print. >Would anybody be willing to share? I finally have a soprano who can SING >them, and the time to teach them to her over the summer. > >THANKS! > >Bud > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: volunteer vs paid organists >From: Innkawgneeto@webtv.net (N Brown) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:40:17 -0400 (EDT) > > >>The wailing and knashing of teeth will come as the Parish Council >anguishes over how to inform the congregation that the church must now >close its doors forever.<< > > >To prove your point, Mr. Krider, just up the road in Elizabeth, NJ, a >beautiful old catholic church (the name escapes me now) is in danger of >being closed and used only for weddings and funerals. The congregation >is now attempting a fundraising campaign to save the building. Anyone >who has ever flown into Newark Intl. Airport from the south has probably >seen this beautiful building. The diocese says there are not enough >people left to justify keeping it open, and that the remaining ones >should move to another parish. I look forward to watching this in the >coming months. To keep this on topic, I don't have any idea what >kind of organ they have (there on topic). --Neil Brown > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: virtuosic hymn-playing, etc. >From: Innkawgneeto@webtv.net (N Brown) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:48:21 -0400 (EDT) > > >Two words, ugh ugh. > >My friend Bruce said: >>> Doing "it" just to do "it", often leads to disaster for failure, at >best. It is the intent which allows the Spirit in!<< > >Isn't that what I said in so many words? >--Neil > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Royal Wedding Music >From: Innkawgneeto@webtv.net (N Brown) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:55:02 -0400 (EDT) > >Richard, maybe it was!! Perhaps with all the people, all the camera >lights, the organ modulated on its own. I haven't seen the service, >I hope it is rebroadcast here in US sometime by someone. --Neil > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Subject: Re: Hurray! >From: Innkawgneeto@webtv.net (N Brown) >Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:56:02 -0400 (EDT) > >No insults here, Richard. CONGRATULATIONS and GOD BLESS YOU, my boy. >--Neil > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >End of PipeChat Digest > >"Pipe Up and Be Heard!" >PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics >HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org >List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org >Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org > >