PipeChat Digest #1384 - Thursday, May 11, 2000
 
Re: Shrine confused?
  by "Ron Natalie" <ron@sensor.com>
"All in the April Evening"
  by "Joe Elliffe" <jelliffe@atlantic.net>
Re: "All in the April Evening"
  by "Bob Elms" <elmsr@albanyis.com.au>
Re: "All in the April Evening"
  by "Mark Harris" <M.Harris@Admin.lon.ac.uk>
Repertoire for Organ and Clarinet needed
  by "Chris Johns" <Chris_Johns@gmx.de>
Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral?
  by "Erik Johnson" <the_maitre@hotmail.com>
Church Music Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral?
  by <ScottFop@aol.com>
Re: For Sale
  by <Victorgan@aol.com>
Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral?
  by "Dave G." <dave_hat@hotmail.com>
Church Music, Ideas and More
  by "Erik Johnson" <the_maitre@hotmail.com>
Re: Marilyn Keiser recital at West Point, NY May 14 (X-post)
  by "Pat Maimone" <patmai@juno.com>
A friend is looking for a roommate at Seattle National
  by "Dr. Darryl Miller" <organdok@safari.net>
Re: Church Music, Ideas and More
  by "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net>
Marchand's Grand Dialogue in C
  by "Dr. Darryl Miller" <organdok@safari.net>
Bad news
  by <Myosotis51@aol.com>
Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by "Tim Bovard" <tmbovard@arkansas.net>
Re: Marchand's Grand Dialogue in C
  by "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net>
Re: Bad news
  by "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net>
Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by "David Scribner" <david@blackiris.com>
Re: Bad news
  by <Posthorn8@aol.com>
Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net>
Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by <Quilisma@socal.rr.com>
Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net>
RE: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm
  by "Bert Atwood" <atwoody@ispchannel.com>
Re: Church Music Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral?
  by <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net>
Re: Repertoire for Organ and Clarinet needed
  by <Cremona502@cs.com>
 


(back) Subject: Re: Shrine confused? From: "Ron Natalie" <ron@sensor.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:44:35 -0400       Innkawgneeto@webtv.net wrote: > > Scott's work is of course a classic example of quality music ministry, > at his Shrine. But, I think the poster was making a freudian reference > to the National Shrine Basillica (if that's the name) in Washington: > another classic example of wonderful music done wonderfully, tastefully, > and spiritually. > I believe the official name is "Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception"  
(back) Subject: "All in the April Evening" From: "Joe Elliffe" <jelliffe@atlantic.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:36:51 -0400   I am looking for music for a piece called ' "All in the April Evening:- The words are by Katharine Tynan and the music is by Sir Hugh Robinson. If anyone has it or can tell me where to get it I would certainly appreciate it.   Joe    
(back) Subject: Re: "All in the April Evening" From: "Bob Elms" <elmsr@albanyis.com.au> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 22:21:43 +0800   I can get this for you if noone closer to your home answers. BTW the composer is Hugh Roberton, a Scot. I am in Australia, but let me know and I can scan and e-mail it to you. Bob Elms.   Joe Elliffe wrote:   > I am looking for music for a piece called ' "All > in the April Evening:- The words are by > Katharine Tynan and the music is by Sir Hugh > Robinson. If anyone has it or can tell me where > to get it I would certainly appreciate it. > > Joe > > "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" > PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics > HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org > List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org > Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org   -- ----------------------------------------------------- Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/      
(back) Subject: Re: "All in the April Evening" From: "Mark Harris" <M.Harris@Admin.lon.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:34:38 GMT   Joe,   "All in the April Evening" was/is published by Roberton Publications. A search on that name yielded up sales@goodmusic-uk.com (a firm I've not heard of, based in Tewkesbury), who claim to distribute Roberton Publications. Suggest you e-mail your request to them.   Regards,   Mark Harris =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Ursa sapientior in medio  
(back) Subject: Repertoire for Organ and Clarinet needed From: "Chris Johns" <Chris_Johns@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:58:20 +0200   Dear All,   As one new to the list I have been fascinated by your discussions about = this funeral. Mine however is a different request.   I'm looking for repertoire for Clarinet and Organ (Mutin-Cavaille-Coll = 1898 two-manual and gorgeous) for a recital I want to give with a talented clarinettist friend of mine. Any ideas? Either orginal or stuff that could be rearrande for that line up. Look forward to your comments.   Best wishes   Chris Johns Musical Assistant, Osnabrueck Cathedral Frankenstrasse 5, D-49082 Osnabrueck Tel/Fax +49 (0)541 528 2568 EMail: Chris_Johns@gmx.de    
(back) Subject: Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral? From: "Erik Johnson" <the_maitre@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:43:14 EDT   For starters: Malcomb mentions the use of singable music - which indeed is part of Vat = II. However - not all the music must be sung by the congregation. But = forgetting that, Eagles Wings is not very singable if we are to sing the notes as written not just slouching around were-ever we feel like a note shall go. =   And be honest, during the song how may people did you see in the congregation singing with all their hearts? Now how many did you see just =   weakly mouthing the words or not opening their mouths at all ?!? In two conferences I attended the composer of this piece stated, "I wish I had never written Eagles Wings in the first place"   Ave Maria is a solo (no congregational singing here) - however it is also theologically inapropriate for communion. For RC's communion is the high point of the mass and celebration is focused on the Sacrifice of Chirst = and HIS presence in the eucharist. A song to the Blessed Mother (really a = Hail Mary sung in Latin) does nothing to focus on Chirst or the Eucharist. It simply sounds nice - aww ain't that purty?   The Mass of Creation is sing songy and trite. Perfect for chilrens mass = but for a state funeral of a Cardinal ? I can name other mass setting which = are probably very well known and sound much more solid and appropriate for = such occasions. Indeed I use them for mass settings at my church.   All in all, the music was probably chosen by the cardinal. It however = shows just how far musical bad taste has gone in the Roman Church. Having known friends of the Cardinals and people who have worker for him - I can say = that I am not surprised by the musical selections. In fact the day the good Cardinal passed I predicted ( with other musicians) that the funeral would =   include "Eagles Wings, The Mass of Creation and Be No Afraid" 2 out of 3 ain't bad.       > > I didn't get to see all of the Cardinal's funeral, but I did see the >beginning. What I don't understand is that all of a sudden we've deemed >the >music as ludicrous for a funeral. I personally saw nothing wrong with = it.   Donald Dumler <sp> has been the cathedral organist now for some years. It should make no difference if he is Southern Baptist or not - playing for a =   Roman Church he should know what is appropriate for a Catholic State Funeral. > And I'm not sure if it was said yet, but the organist was a Southern >Baptist (as was said repeatedly on the Fox News broadcast)   ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com    
(back) Subject: Church Music Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral? From: <ScottFop@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:01:03 EDT   In a message dated 5/10/00 11:44:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time, the_maitre@hotmail.com writes:   << For starters: Malcomb mentions the use of singable music - which indeed is part of Vat = II. However - not all the music must be sung by the congregation.   THANK YOU! But why do we have SO MANY priests who are willing to ignore = and or throw out good choral literature and choral masses when Catholic congregations, as a rule, do not sing that well to begin with? Look at = the differences in the amount of time Roman Catholics have sung = congregationally versus Protestant congregations who have done it for HUNDREDS of years. HELLOOOOOOOOOOO?     But forgetting that, Eagles Wings is not very singable if we are to sing the notes as written not just slouching around were-ever we feel like a note shall go. =   It was written for soloist and geeeeetar at best in my opinion.     And be honest, during the song how may people did you see in the congregation singing with all their hearts? Now how many did you see = just weakly mouthing the words or not opening their mouths at all ?!?   See above.     In two conferences I attended the composer of this piece stated, "I wish I =   had never written Eagles Wings in the first place"   I'll second that, and third it and fourth it and so on.   Ave Maria is a solo (no congregational singing here) - however it is also =   theologically inapropriate for communion. <snip> A song to the Blessed Mother (really a Hail Mary sung in Latin) does nothing to focus on Chirst = or the Eucharist. It simply sounds nice - aww ain't that purty? And that last sentence is just about how far MOST Catholics' knowledge of music go these days.     The Mass of Creation is sing songy and trite.   Yes, and I would also like to add to that obtrusive, drawing too much attention to itself instead of supporting the movement of the liturgy and tacky.     Perfect for chilrens mass   Not EVEN in my opinion. We "retired" it here. <hee hee>     but for a state funeral of a Cardinal ?   Of COURSE NOT! >=3Do\ Again- this is the type of garbage that many =   Catholics have built their music programs around for the past 25 years and =   have "conveniently forgotten" the REAL literature. the traditional music either takes too much work and effort or the individual parish musicians = and clergy don't want to deal with it and have no problem taking the easy way = out and spoon feeding glory and praise and contemporary music to their congregations.     I can name other mass setting which are probably very well known and sound much more solid and appropriate for = such occasions. Indeed I use them for mass settings at my church.   Same here at the National Shrine of the Little Flower!   All in all, the music was probably chosen by the cardinal. It however = shows just how far musical bad taste has gone in the Roman Church.   I rest my case (again).     Having known friends of the Cardinals and people who have worker for him = - I can say that I am not surprised by the musical selections. In fact the day =   the good Cardinal passed I predicted ( with other musicians) that the funeral = would include "Eagles Wings, The Mass of Creation and Be No Afraid" 2 out of 3 =   ain't bad.   Unfortunately- I thought the exact same thing. But here's another thing = to consider: how many parishes do that garbage DAILY and WEEKLY without fail and = without end????????? It's scary folks and it's getting REAL OLD- it certainly = makes my job and the job of others TRYING to do GOOD music more and more = difficult because St. Feel-Good's-Down-the-Street is doing multiple geeeeeeeeeetar masses with On Eagles' Wings every weekend.   We are having a funeral here Friday. When speaking with the family by = phone yesterday they asked for a soloist, and were even specific as to what kind = of sound they wanted said vocalist to produce. I got hopeful thinking to = myself "ah- we can FINALLY give the Resurrection Choir <UGH!> a day off and do = some REAL solos and things." Then they called this morning and said: "we really want to keep the music very traditional." Again I got hopeful and = excited. She then said: "we want Be Not Afraid, Prayer of St. Francis, Ave Maria = (you guessed it- AT COMMUNION) and Wind Beneath My Wings." So much for "we really want to keep it traditional." Traditional to Catholics these days = is S%@T! 'Nuf said.   Scott Foppiano    
(back) Subject: Re: For Sale From: <Victorgan@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:21:43 EDT   Bert:   Do you have prices for the Wurlitzer parts you have for sale? Any = additional information? If so, may I ask you to forward it to me?   Thank-you!   Vic  
(back) Subject: Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral? From: "Dave G." <dave_hat@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:13:06 PDT   >and Be Not Afraid" 2 out of 3 >ain't bad.   That is a horrible song, makes me sick to my stomach from my catholic childhood. Especially when you have to sit through it every few weeks played on gee-tar with lusty tambourine and whatever-those-little-latin-rattle-thingies accompaniment.   DG   ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com    
(back) Subject: Church Music, Ideas and More From: "Erik Johnson" <the_maitre@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:26:34 EDT   Right On the Money Scott! I keep on saying that every time "crud" is done it always gives "the faithful" it is o-k and desireable to have "crud". I can't tell you how many times I have heard, "But St. So-and-so's does it and they sing" I = feel like I am a small minority fighting tooth and nail for quality and what is =   "really" Roman Catholic. Here in New England it sometimes almost seems = that "crud" is considered the norm and what is desirable; whereas quality music =   is the evil bad stuff that Vatican II has abolished forever! Every time I =   tell then to get out thier Vat II documents and read them they retort, = "But St. so-and-so's is doing it"   This was my biggest problem with the funeral music. Knowing that most Catholics love to do and hear what the "important" people do and hear - = now I have to contend with the phrase, "But the Cardinal Had it - why can't = we." UGH   I really think it is time for a national Catholic Musicians guild that promotes quality music and quality musicians!!!!!   All the Best,   The Maitre   But here's another thing to >consider: >how many parishes do that garbage DAILY and WEEKLY without fail and = without >end????????? It's scary folks and it's getting REAL OLD- it certainly >makes >my job and the job of others TRYING to do GOOD music more and more >difficult >because St. Feel-Good's-Down-the-Street is doing multiple geeeeeeeeeetar >masses with On Eagles' Wings every weekend. >   ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com    
(back) Subject: Re: Marilyn Keiser recital at West Point, NY May 14 (X-post) From: "Pat Maimone" <patmai@juno.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:05:21 -0400   Dear Ed and Pipechatters,   On Tue, 9 May 2000 21:02:47 -0400 (EDT) edbroorg@webtv.net (Ed Brown) writes: > Can outsiders attend the recital at the chapel (non military people)   Yes, indeed!   Pat Maimone ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.  
(back) Subject: A friend is looking for a roommate at Seattle National From: "Dr. Darryl Miller" <organdok@safari.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 06:00:05 -0400   Hi, Y'all!   I good friend of mine called this afternoon wanting to share a room with = me for the National. Alas, my roommates will be my "girls" -- daughter and wife. However, I told him I would "get the word out" and see if any of you need a roomie or know of someone looking to share a room in Seattle.   He is early 30's, incredibly gifted musician (who is an organist, by the way, as opposed to juuuust an organist), single, a non-smoker, wonderful conversationalist, wonderfully read, and for sure not a bar-crazed whore, but not a prude! You've seen his face in TAO countless times over the past decade, and has even performed at a couple of Nationals.   Anyway, e-mail me a note if you're interested, and I'll forward the notes to him.   Yours, laughing out loud at how I described him,   I am,   Darryl by the Sea    
(back) Subject: Re: Church Music, Ideas and More From: "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:03:06   At 05:26 PM 5/10/2000 EDT, you wrote: >I really think it is time for a national Catholic Musicians guild that >promotes quality music and quality musicians!!!!!<snip>   Such an organization, conceivably, could function as a committee of the AGO, which would allow the Guild to function, for once, as a true guild of sorts. However, politics being what they are, I don't see this happening anytime soon.   DeserTBoB  
(back) Subject: Marchand's Grand Dialogue in C From: "Dr. Darryl Miller" <organdok@safari.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 06:08:13 -0400   Hi, Y'all!   I remember so very well the playing of the Marchand "Grand Dialogue in C" which was one of the required pieces at the National Competition in Houston. I have yet to get Matthew Durst's very, very elegant rendering of this piece out of my musical memory!   It's time for me to see if I can do this wonderful piece justice, so . . . I called Lois Fyfe Music in Nashvegas and my friend, Lisa, said, "I'll = take care of you," and lo-and-behold 2 days later, a volume of Marchad shows up in the mail. This is the Kalmus edition and includes a few suites, but nothing that looks like the grandest of grand jeus. In this edition, there are many pages and movements unmarked, so with a quick look-through at my desk this afternoon, I couldn't find the "song."   In a word, HELP!   And of course, thanks and thanks very much.   Yours, having to drive 3 hours tomorrow to get to state choir contest, and then play for 5 choirs, and four soloists, I am a verrrrry tired (but = still good lookin'),     Darryl by the Sea    
(back) Subject: Bad news From: <Myosotis51@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:32:36 EDT   Dear "Listers,"   I received some news this week that has me reeling. I had a "routine" lumptectomy last week, and was just told that I have breast cancer and = will need more surgery followed by chemo and radiation therapies.   Please pray for me.   Vicki Ceruti Organist, Center Moriches UMC Long Island, New York  
(back) Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: "Tim Bovard" <tmbovard@arkansas.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:56:33 -0500   At 5/10/00 01:04 AM, Van Vanpool wrote: >My dear Mr. Wechsler: > > Will you deign to pardon the intrusion <SNIP>   (well, you all tried to read it too...where would one *start* to quote?)   My dear Mr Vanpool,   say *WHAT*????   May we please have a translation of your words into something resembling "standard English"...? (Unless, of course, your verbiage was an attempt = to "slam" Malcom for something or other, in which case we all do NOT need to rehash it....)   Curiously yours --   Tim              
(back) Subject: Re: Marchand's Grand Dialogue in C From: "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:24:08   At 06:08 AM 5/10/2000 -0400, Darryl's other brother Darryl wrote: >I am a verrrrry tired (but still >good lookin')   Well, as many things go on this list, this could be a matter of subjective purview and opinion...and speculation....   hehehehehehehe!   DeserTBoB      
(back) Subject: Re: Bad news From: "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:48:36   At 06:32 PM 5/10/2000 EDT, you wrote: >I received some news this week that has me reeling. I had a "routine" >lumptectomy last week, and was just told that I have breast cancer and = will >need more surgery followed by chemo and radiation therapies.<snip>   Following your doctor's treatment regimen, including a good diet and whatever exercise you can stand, along with positive outlook will help you defeat the cancer, as will all our good wishes, I'm sure. Never give in = or up to the cancer; sheer willpower can do amazing things, we're just now learning.   DeserTBoB    
(back) Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: "David Scribner" <david@blackiris.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 19:24:42 -0500   >At 5/10/00 01:04 AM, Van Vanpool wrote: > >My dear Mr. Wechsler: > > > > Will you deign to pardon the intrusion <SNIP> > >(well, you all tried to read it too...where would one *start* to quote?) > >My dear Mr Vanpool, > >say *WHAT*???? > >May we please have a translation of your words into something resembling >"standard English"...? (Unless, of course, your verbiage was an attempt = to >"slam" Malcom for something or other, in which case we all do NOT need to >rehash it....) > >Curiously yours -- > >Tim   Tim   Thank you - I have been trying to figure out that post ever since it arrived. If it is a "slam" there is no place for it on this list BUT who knows in amongst all that verbiage.   I along with probably many others, could also be signed "Curiously = yours---"   David    
(back) Subject: Re: Bad news From: <Posthorn8@aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:06:50 EDT   Dear Vicki:   My thoughts and prayers are with you as you walk this road. Being the = father of a severely handicapped daughter who was supposed to never make 8 years (just turned 13) I know what its like to fight for ones life. Just = remember there is always joy amidst the tears. When you only see one set of footprints, remember it's because the one you help so many to worship on Sunday mornings is holding you in His wonderful hands.   The Peace of Christ,   Tim Schramm Rochester, NY  
(back) Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:12:39   At 07:24 PM 5/10/2000 -0500, you wrote: >>At 5/10/00 01:04 AM, Van Vanpool wrote: >> >My dear Mr. Wechsler: >> > Will you deign to pardon the intrusion <SNIP> >>(well, you all tried to read it too...where would one *start* to quote?)   Now, dearest listmates, let us contemplate this work of art on its face, rather than simply admire its boquet! It's quite apparent that Mr. Wechsler was served up "au flamb=E9"...and on a rotisserie spit, yet! However, the perfumery of such prose I haven't seen committed to electronic messaging ever before, and its author deserves much credit for his erudite use of the English langauge. Alas...pity poor Wechsler, however, who, though having possibly been beguiled by such a florid and loquatious display of the written word, was none the less cooked to a turn and left with the proverbial apple in his mouth...though on a platter of the finest sterling silver, to be certain!   DeserTBoB  
(back) Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: <Quilisma@socal.rr.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:14:01 -0700   ROFLMAO~!   Bob Scarborough wrote:   > At 07:24 PM 5/10/2000 -0500, you wrote: > >>At 5/10/00 01:04 AM, Van Vanpool wrote: > >> >My dear Mr. Wechsler: > >> > Will you deign to pardon the intrusion <SNIP> > >>(well, you all tried to read it too...where would one *start* to = quote?) > > Now, dearest listmates, let us contemplate this work of art on its face, > rather than simply admire its boquet! It's quite apparent that Mr. > Wechsler was served up "au flamb=E9"...and on a rotisserie spit, yet! > However, the perfumery of such prose I haven't seen committed to = electronic > messaging ever before, and its author deserves much credit for his = erudite > use of the English langauge. Alas...pity poor Wechsler, however, who, > though having possibly been beguiled by such a florid and loquatious > display of the written word, was none the less cooked to a turn and left > with the proverbial apple in his mouth...though on a platter of the = finest > sterling silver, to be certain! > > DeserTBoB > > "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" > PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics > HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org > List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org > Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org    
(back) Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: "Bob Scarborough" <desertbob@rglobal.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:17:26   At 07:24 PM 5/10/2000 -0500, I, the Bard of the Barren, wrote: >loquatious display of the written word   Woe be unto me, as I've butched His Majesty's tongue, misselling as I did the word "loquacious". For such transgression shall I be also be = consigned to the broiler of criticism!   dB  
(back) Subject: RE: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm From: "Bert Atwood" <atwoody@ispchannel.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:16:44 -0700   Also "bouquet"...   > -----Original Message----- > From: pipechat@pipechat.org [mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org]On Behalf Of > Bob Scarborough > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 6:17 PM > To: PipeChat > Subject: Re: An earnest plea to the helpful Malcolm > > > At 07:24 PM 5/10/2000 -0500, I, the Bard of the Barren, wrote: > >loquatious display of the written word > > Woe be unto me, as I've butched His Majesty's tongue, misselling as I = did > the word "loquacious". For such transgression shall I be also be > consigned > to the broiler of criticism! > > dB > > "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" > PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics > HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org > List: mailto:pipechat@pipechat.org > Administration: mailto:admin@pipechat.org > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: mailto:requests@pipechat.org > >  
(back) Subject: Re: Church Music Re: What exactly WAS wrong with the funeral? From: <Innkawgneeto@webtv.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:51:36 -0400 (EDT)   Catholics do not have the corner on neglecting quality literature for the sake of appealing to the masses. It is a problem in many many denoms.   I do think, however, that "Lift High the Cross" was a wonderful conclusion.   Neil    
(back) Subject: Re: Repertoire for Organ and Clarinet needed From: <Cremona502@cs.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 01:39:32 EDT   In a message dated 5/10/00 11:39:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Chris_Johns@gmx.de writes:   > I'm looking for repertoire for Clarinet and Organ (Mutin-Cavaille-Coll = 1898 > two-manual and gorgeous) for a recital I want to give with a talented > clarinettist friend of mine. Any ideas? Either orginal or stuff that = could > be rearrande for that line up. Look forward to your comments. > Many pieces can have instruments worked in for solo lines. Some likely candidates would be: Liturgical Improvisation I -- George Oldroyd Aria -- Flor Peeters, Charles Callahan Folk Tune -- Charles Callahan Air --Water Music -- Handel Suite Gothique (Priere a Notre Dame) -- Boellmann   ..... just about any piece of music with solo lines is a candidate for transcription. Chorale Preludes and hymn tunes preludes are especially fertile territory.   Bruce .. . . .in the Beagles' Nest with the Baskerbeagles Molly, Duncan, and Miles Cremona502@cs.com http://ourworld.cs.com/Brucon502