PipeChat Digest #4952 - Thursday, December 2, 2004 RE: The Organist's Ball. by "Colin Mitchell" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Re: The Organist's Ball. by "bobelms" <email@example.com> RE: Helmsley by "Henry Glass" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Growing in a world of Process Theology WAS Being around suitable pipe org by "T.Desiree' Hines" <email@example.com> End the manipulation and twisting of words by <TubaMagna@aol.com> RE: The Organist's Ball. by "Will Light" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
(back) Subject: RE: The Organist's Ball. From: "Colin Mitchell" <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:37:16 -0800 (PST) Hello, Well, as it's getting towards the Christmas parties:- Mr & Mrs Flute & their organ playing son, Hell, with their daughters Bouchee and Harmonique Mr & Mrs Strena, and their daughter Sylvia Strena Ms.Viole, and her constant companion, Celeste Please be upstanding for their Royal Highnesses; the infant Princess, Messing Regal and the Prince Jungefern Regal (en chamade). The Dutch Ambassador to England, Koor Anglais Mr & Mrs Ron, and their daughter Clair Ron Please welcome the Italian Ambassador, Snr. Nona and his 19 year old bride, Decima Nona Enough! Regards, Colin Mitchell UK __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
(back) Subject: Re: The Organist's Ball. From: "bobelms" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:37:50 +0800 So was Miss Clara Bell BE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Grove" <email@example.com> To: "PipeChat" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:59 PM Subject: Re: The Organist's Ball. > Entries for the attendants at the "Organist's Ball" > > Was Prince Ipple there? > > He certainly was! And he brought with him his friends Mr. and Mrs. > Pneumatic > and their daughter Electra Pneumatic! > > "I believe I saw her out in the garden, in the chill of the evening, > talking to the daughter of my old pal, 'Hat-pegs'. > > You know, Chap; Pal Hat-pegs" ................ (keep working at it, = it'll > come). > > Otherwise, go straight to Mornington Crescent. > > Harry Grove > [a.k.a. a musicman - but obviously no comedian] > __________________________________________ > > "Nothing separates the generations more than music. By the time a child = is > eight or nine, he has developed a passion for his own music that is even = > stronger than his passions for procrastination and weird clothes." > Bill Cosby > > ****************************************************************** > "Pipe Up and Be Heard!" > PipeChat: A discussion List for pipe/digital organs & related topics > HOMEPAGE : http://www.pipechat.org > List: mailto:email@example.com > Administration: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org > List-Subscribe: <mailto:email@example.com> > List-Digest: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:email@example.com> >
(back) Subject: RE: Helmsley From: "Henry Glass" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:32:18 -0600 A reminder: After the Last Verse by Archer is 96028 and available from www.Melbay.com <http://www.melbay.com/> . The previously mentioned 200 verses by June Nixon is 98610 and also available from Mel Bay Publications. =20 ________________________________ From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of SWF12262@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:04 PM To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Helmsley =20 Check out "After the Last Verse," by Malcolm Archer -- very short, but a great postlude, and a terrific starting point for your own improvisation. Kevin Mayhew is publisher, I think, but I'm working by memory here. =20
(back) Subject: Growing in a world of Process Theology WAS Being around suitable pipe organs From: "T.Desiree' Hines" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:52:24 -0800 (PST) RMB10@aol.com wrote: I find it interesting that you changed your tune, though, concerning your last church. You wouldn't consider pipes at all, and even with the digital = organ you were going to get, you didn't even want the pipes connected to it. = This is why it was said a couple of days ago that it is the organist who wants = all the gadgets and lights and "stuff" on the console and is attracted by the superficial aspects of what the instrument has to offer. In response: Theres a little term that two other mentors from WA State discuss with me = regularly: Process Theology. A part of that is, God's Earth and People are = constantly changing and growing, and that nothing remains the same. This = is certainly applicable to us as organists...and as human beings. Things = come along to help ius grow and change as people. Professional Development = endeaors such as the Ch. Mus. Summit, and going to play a digital organ = after being at some decent, but not glorious, pipe organs have helped to = shape an individual. Process Theology applies to all of our lives. If = anyone here knows something they did not know before, that helped to make = them a better musician or person...they have been a part of Process = Theology. TDH --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
(back) Subject: End the manipulation and twisting of words From: <TubaMagna@aol.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:15:09 EST Is it really insulting to repeat what tens of thousands of organ-players = say? I was dealing with the truth, which is that most organists, including = many, many on these chat lists, are very proud of their electronic organs, and express open contempt for pipe organ builders and those with an interest = in the history of the instrument. It is very much part of public record that these chat lists speak of conscientious pipe organ builders with disgust and condescension. One can = access thousands of posts from organ-players who insist that even if they could = tell the difference, they simply don't care. It is part of the permanent electronic = record that many organ-players refuse to play instruments they deem too = small for their needs, and that they insist on very, very large artificial = instruments to MEET their needs. I am not insulting them, but they MAY be insulting themselves. Is it not the depths of hypocrisy to proudly state one's inability to = discern between real and fake, and THEN turn around and make pronouncements about = the comparitive quality of various pipe organs? Of organ performances? Of = musical compositions? The re-statement of facts may be clearly made to make the reader THINK, = and therefore draw CONCLUSIONS, which can be either another set of facts, or a = set of opinions. But the statement of facts cannot be an insulting act. Sebastian M. Gluck New York City ..
(back) Subject: RE: The Organist's Ball. From: "Will Light" <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:23:30 -0000 Kindly be Prepared for Mr. & Mrs. Zug and their daughter, Belinda Zug! Will Light Coventry UK